Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Everything according to plan (except jerks)

Tuesday 21st July
Snatch: 2@33, 2@36, 1@38, 1@40, 1@42, 1@44, 1@46, 1@46, miss@46, miss@46, 1@46
Rack jerk: 2@35, 2@40, 2@45, 1@49, 53, 56, 56, 58, 58, 58, 55, 55.
Cleans: 2@40, 2@45, 2@50, 2@55, 2@60, 2@63 x 4
Front squats: 3@45, 3@55, 3@62, 3@68, 3@72 x 3

Change on last few weeks in this session - this is usually power snatches and behind the neck jerks and we've changed to snatch and rack jerk singles. This is usually a good training day, I'm sharp from previous day snatching but not exhausted from heavy cleaning and squatting.

This worked reasonably well. Snatches were nice and sharp. Missed 2 reps at the top weight, one overpulled and one underpulled. More practice with heavyish snatches will likely sort this out.

Rack jerks weren't great though, much shakier than those weights should be - again something's going wrong with the drive, still trying to figure out what. It might actually be a couple of things, Harry thinks I'm dipping too deep before I drive, which I probably am, and it also occurred to me late on that I might be driving from my toes, rather than my heels. If I could only get the same power in these as I am in my power jerks the numbers would be much, much better. I wonder if switching some jerk assistance exercises into my Monday's training might sharpen me up a bit for Tuesday's jerks. This is all most likely in my head, of course.

Cleans all fine, added another set of doubles on last week, and did another kilo on the front squat triples so the leg strength still seems to be coming along according to plan.

3 comments:

  1. Bruce Bamford used to say after an overpulled snatch to put a little more weight on and pull the exact same way. Often worked. Hard not to over correct and not under pull the same weight.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There is a section on Jerk technique in this article: http://www.mikesgym.org/newsletter/issues/july061.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks neoct - good article.

    Pete - I'll try that one on Harry next time :)

    ReplyDelete